...but at least they admit it. I found this interesting. They listed what they thought to be the 100 most influential albums of all time, and in the 2nd sentence of the article admit that they left out PINK FLOYD! Not one single Floyd album! if I got a subscription to this mag, I'd cancel it.
Here is the article (it's actually got great links to each album, worth checking out):
"So here's how we chose the albums for the All-TIME 100. We researched and listened and agonized until we had a list of the greatest and most influential records ever - and then everyone complained because there was no Pink Floyd on it. And that's exactly how it should be. We hope you'll treat the All-TIME 100 as a great musical parlor game. Read and listen to the arguments for the selections, then tell us what we missed or got wrong. Or even possibly what we got right."
Guess who showed up the most times on the list (without peeking):
The Rolling Stones